Senator Jim Banks joins Tudor Dixon for a wide-ranging conversation on the biggest Supreme Court rulings shaping America's future. They discuss the court's decision on late-arriving mail-in ballots, why Republicans must pass the SAVE America Act, and the fight for stronger election integrity before the 2026 midterms.

Banks also weighs in on the Supreme Court's Title IX ruling protecting women's sports, the debate over birthright citizenship, and why he believes a constitutional amendment is needed. Plus, he explains his push to eliminate DEI policies from the U.S. military and restore merit-based promotions.

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

David Rutherford — former Navy SEAL and CIA-trained intelligence officer — sits down with Major Mike Reynolds, one of the only official US Marine Corps Combat Artists, a munitions officer who documented four combat deployments with a sketchbook in one hand and a rifle in the other.

You'll learn why the Marine Corps has sent artists into combat since 1942, the difference between art that informs and propaganda that persuades, and the survival skill hiding inside every great painting — the same eye that spots a hidden bomb is the eye that makes a great artist.

David and Mike break down why combat is "99% boredom, 1% exhilaration," why Hollywood gets it backwards, and how a single sketchbook page can bring a whole deployment — and the friends you lost — roaring back to life. Mike Reynolds is an active-duty Marine officer with 24+ years of service and four combat deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan, now serving as a Marine Corps Combat Artist for the Corps' History Division.

Sponsors:
☕ Black Rifle Coffee: https://www.blackriflecoffee.com/
🏫 Get coaching by David Rutherford: https://www.froglogicinstitute.com/

🕘 Timestamps:

00:00 - Preview

01:34 - What Is A Combat Artist?

08:13 - Propaganda vs. Art

11:35 - Growing Up & Discovering Art

26:19 - George Washington Crossing The Delaware

31:06 - Capturing The Relatable Moments of Combat

38:13 - Marines Should Be Creative

45:52 - Celebrating America

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Trade policy is about far more than prices at the checkout line. Steve Yates examines Ambassador Robert Lighthizer’s book No Trade Is Free and explains how globalization, tariffs, manufacturing, supply chains, and U.S.-China trade have reshaped America’s economic and national security priorities. He explores why reciprocity, strategic industries, and economic resilience have become central to today’s trade debate.  

Follow Nation States with Yates for clear, common-sense insights where Steve Yates serves as your personal national security advisor, breaking down world events in ways that matter to Main Street, not just Washington.

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. “Activist” District Attorney in Philadelphia

• Focuses on Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner

  • He improperly seeks to overturn murder convictions
  • He “confesses error” in court to release prisoners

• A court ruling is cited criticizing the DA’s conduct, including:

  • Lack of candor
  • Misrepresentation of facts
  • Inadequate investigation

• Broader narrative:

  • Connects Krasner’s actions to George Soros, portrayed as funding progressive prosecutors
  • Argues these policies lead to increased crime and societal instability

---

2. Federal Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan Blocks Voter Verification Tool

• The judge blocked use of a database (SAVE system) intended to:

  • Check immigration status in relation to eligibility (such as voting or benefits)

• The ruling’s justification (as described):

  • Concerns about privacy violations
  • Risk of wrongful removal of eligible voters

• Commentary strongly criticizes the ruling:

  • Calls it “activist” and legally incorrect
  • Argues the law allows the government to verify data internally

---

3. Supreme Court Immigration Decisions

Two Supreme Court rulings (described as 6–3 decisions):

Case 1: Migrants outside U.S.

• Court ruled that migrants outside U.S. territory are not entitled to full legal protections
• Supports policies like “Remain in Mexico”

Case 2: Temporary Protected Status (TPS)

• Court ruled that:

  • The executive branch (Trump administration) can revoke TPS protections

• Means certain groups (e.g., Haitian, Syrian migrants) could lose legal status

• The podcast presents these as:

  • “Major victories” for border enforcement
  • Restoration of presidential authority on immigration

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: 

Investigative journalist Asra Nomani joins Lisa Boothe for an in-depth conversation about the growing influence of Marxist and socialist organizations in the United States, the funding networks behind modern protest movements, and why the Department of Justice is reportedly investigating tech billionaire Neville Roy Singham.

Nomani explains her years-long investigation into what she calls the "Red-Green Alliance"—a coalition of Marxist, socialist, and Islamist activists—and discusses how foreign influence, activist organizations, and ideological movements intersect with American politics, higher education, and grassroots organizing.

The conversation also explores the rise of democratic socialism, the influence of communist ideology in modern political movements, and why Nomani believes Americans should pay closer attention to the organizations shaping today's political landscape.

Start protecting what you've worked hard for, right now. Head over to coveron.com/truth to learn more about how Coveron has your back.

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show delivers a wide-ranging, politically charged discussion centered on a major Supreme Court decision on birthright citizenship, which dominates the hour and drives broader debates on immigration policy, constitutional law, and American identity. Hosting solo, Buck Sexton frames the 6–3 ruling as one of the most consequential—and controversial—judicial decisions in modern history, emphasizing that the Court upheld the interpretation that anyone born on U.S. soil is a citizen (with limited exceptions such as diplomats), including children of undocumented immigrants and so-called “birth tourism.” The conversation repeatedly highlights concerns about immigration loopholes, anchor babies, and national security risks, arguing that the ruling could incentivize foreign nationals to exploit U.S. laws, particularly citing China as a geopolitical rival.

Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio calls in and analyzes dissenting opinions from Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch, portraying the ruling as an example of judicial overreach versus originalist constitutional interpretation, while also drawing comparisons to historically controversial Supreme Court cases like Dred Scott and Roe v. Wade. The discussion expands into immigration enforcement policy, including critiques of sanctuary cities, catch-and-release practices, and the broader political divide between Republicans and Democrats on border security. There is also a significant focus on how birthright citizenship could influence future political eligibility, chain migration, and even hypothetical national security threats, such as foreign-born individuals returning to the U.S. as citizens after being raised abroad.

Buck welcomes guest Rafael Mangual, author of Criminal Injustice. This third hour emphasizes a deep dive into crime policy, policing debates, and the real-world consequences of progressive reforms, alongside culturally charged conversations about gender identity issues, free speech, and American political identity.  Mangual’s expert analysis of criminal justice reform and the push for decarceration and depolicing, arguing that these policies—widely supported after the 2020 protests—have had harmful effects, particularly in urban communities and among Black Americans. The discussion frames rising crime trends and the subsequent reversal of some reforms as evidence that reduced policing and leniency in prosecution increased violence, with hosts emphasizing that effective policing historically correlates with lower homicide rates and improved public safety outcomes. Mangual underscores that incarceration serves a critical role in crime prevention through incapacitation, challenging progressive narratives that prioritize rehabilitation over deterrence.

A major legal and political focus of Hour 3 is the Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship, sparking a detailed constitutional debate. Mangual aligns more closely with the dissenting justices, questioning whether the 14th Amendment’s original intent supports granting automatic citizenship to children of non-citizens or temporary visitors, including so-called “birth tourism” cases. The conversation highlights competing interpretations among justices such as Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, and critiques the use of executive action instead of legislative authority. The hosts and guest ultimately argue that any meaningful change would require congressional action or a constitutional amendment—an extremely unlikely outcome, reinforcing the political stalemate around immigration reform.

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/

Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton: 

X - https://x.com/clayandbuck

Hour 1 of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show delivers a wide-ranging, politically charged discussion centered on a major Supreme Court decision on birthright citizenship, which dominates the hour and drives broader debates on immigration policy, constitutional law, and American identity. Hosting solo, Buck Sexton frames the 6–3 ruling as one of the most consequential—and controversial—judicial decisions in modern history, emphasizing that the Court upheld the interpretation that anyone born on U.S. soil is a citizen (with limited exceptions such as diplomats), including children of undocumented immigrants and so-called “birth tourism.” The conversation repeatedly highlights concerns about immigration loopholes, anchor babies, and national security risks, arguing that the ruling could incentivize foreign nationals to exploit U.S. laws, particularly citing China as a geopolitical rival.

Sexton underscores that the Court’s majority viewed birthright citizenship as constitutionally protected under the 14th Amendment, meaning that changing the policy would require a constitutional amendment rather than congressional legislation, a point he stresses as a major obstacle for immigration reform.

Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio calls in and analyzes dissenting opinions from Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch, portraying the ruling as an example of judicial overreach versus originalist constitutional interpretation, while also drawing comparisons to historically controversial Supreme Court cases like Dred Scott and Roe v. Wade. The discussion expands into immigration enforcement policy, including critiques of sanctuary cities, catch-and-release practices, and the broader political divide between Republicans and Democrats on border security. There is also a significant focus on how birthright citizenship could influence future political eligibility, chain migration, and even hypothetical national security threats, such as foreign-born individuals returning to the U.S. as citizens after being raised abroad.

In addition to the headline case, Hour 1 briefly covers other Supreme Court rulings, including a decision on transgender athletes and Title IX, which Sexton characterizes as a victory for those advocating that biological sex should determine participation in sports, reinforcing the legal definition of sex-based separation in education. This ruling is described as important but ultimately overshadowed by the birthright citizenship decision. The hour also touches on a campaign finance ruling, though it is framed as a minor issue compared to the broader constitutional implications of immigration and citizenship law.

Other segments in this hour include discussion of legislative responses and political strategy, with calls for Congress to pursue tighter immigration laws, restrict birth tourism, and potentially revisit the 14th Amendment. The show also delves into current political dynamics and upcoming elections, highlighting Republican optimism in key races and emphasizing the role of voter turnout and immigration as a defining campaign issue.

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/

Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton: 

X - https://x.com/clayandbuck

FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/

IG -

Hour 2 of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show delivers a wide-ranging, high-energy discussion centered on breaking Supreme Court decisions, constitutional law, immigration policy, and the national debate over women’s sports and Title IX, with strong commentary on the political and cultural implications of these issues. The hour opens with analysis of a major Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship, where the Court struck down a policy challenge and reaffirmed long-standing interpretations of the Constitution. Clay and Buck frame the decision as highly consequential for U.S. immigration policy, arguing it preserves incentives for birth tourism and so-called “anchor baby” dynamics, while raising concerns about taxpayer burdens, healthcare costs, and the long-term value of American citizenship. They also emphasize the ideological fractures within the Court, noting that key conservative justices joined the liberal bloc, reinforcing their broader argument that the Supreme Court has become increasingly political and unreliable as a consistently conservative institution.

Building on that theme, the hosts explore the limited ability of Congress to address immigration outcomes shaped by judicial rulings, pointing out that any meaningful reform would likely require a constitutional amendment, a near-impossible hurdle in today’s political climate. They connect this to broader concerns about national sovereignty, border policy, and executive authority, while referencing discussions with lawmakers like Jim Jordan about potential—but constrained—legislative responses.

The conversation then pivots to a second major and more positively framed Supreme Court case involving Title IX and women’s sports, which Clay and Buck describe as a significant victory for competitive fairness and biological distinctions in athletics. The Court’s 6–3 ruling upholds state laws such as West Virginia’s Save Women’s Sports Act and Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act, affirming that school sports teams can be designated based on biological sex at birth. The hosts outline the legal reasoning, emphasizing that Title IX protections were originally designed to expand opportunities for biological females, and argue that allowing biological males who identify as female to compete in women’s sports undermines decades of progress in female athletics, equal opportunity, and athlete safety.

A substantial portion of Hour 2 is dedicated to the transgender athlete debate, which Clay and Buck frame as one of the defining cultural and legal issues in America today. They discuss real-world cases involving transgender participation in girls’ sports, citing concerns about physical advantages such as bone density, testosterone levels, and muscle mass, and argue that these differences create unfair competition and potential safety risks. The hosts also critique dissenting Supreme Court justices, claiming their interpretation of gender identity under Title IX conflicts with biological reality and the law’s original intent.

The broader political implications are a recurring theme, with Clay and Buck asserting that Democrats are uniformly aligned on expanding gender identity protections, while Republicans have an opportunity to push back by emphasizing science, fairness, and women’s rights. They extend this argument beyond sports into other policy areas, including prison placement policies and public safety, arguing that similar ideological conflicts are emerging across multiple institutions.

Throughout Hour 2, the hosts blend legal analysis with cultural commentary and audience engagement, including listener calls that reinforce the intensity of public opinion on these topics. While there are lighter moments touching on music and personal anecdotes, the core of the hour remains focused on constitutional interpretation, Supreme Court rulings, immigration debates, and the future of women’s sports in America.

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/

Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton: 

X -

Hour 3 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show delivers a wide-ranging, high-energy discussion centered on criminal justice reform, immigration policy, Supreme Court rulings, constitutional law, and rising socialist ideology in U.S. politics, featuring in-studio guest Rafael Mangual, author of Criminal Injustice. This third hour emphasizes a deep dive into crime policy, policing debates, and the real-world consequences of progressive reforms, alongside culturally charged conversations about gender identity issues, free speech, and American political identity.

The hour begins with Mangual’s expert analysis of criminal justice reform and the push for decarceration and depolicing, arguing that these policies—widely supported after the 2020 protests—have had harmful effects, particularly in urban communities and among Black Americans. The discussion frames rising crime trends and the subsequent reversal of some reforms as evidence that reduced policing and leniency in prosecution increased violence, with hosts emphasizing that effective policing historically correlates with lower homicide rates and improved public safety outcomes. Mangual underscores that incarceration serves a critical role in crime prevention through incapacitation, challenging progressive narratives that prioritize rehabilitation over deterrence.

A major legal and political focus of Hour 3 is the Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship, sparking a detailed constitutional debate. Mangual aligns more closely with the dissenting justices, questioning whether the 14th Amendment’s original intent supports granting automatic citizenship to children of non-citizens or temporary visitors, including so-called “birth tourism” cases. The conversation highlights competing interpretations among justices such as Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, and critiques the use of executive action instead of legislative authority. The hosts and guest ultimately argue that any meaningful change would require congressional action or a constitutional amendment—an extremely unlikely outcome, reinforcing the political stalemate around immigration reform.

The immigration discussion is further enriched by Mangual’s personal family story, offering a compelling example of legal immigration and the traditional American success narrative. He recounts how his Dominican grandfather aided U.S. Marines during political unrest following the fall of dictator Rafael Trujillo, which helped him secure legal entry into the United States. This story highlights themes of patriotism, opportunity, and lawful immigration pathways, contrasting sharply with current debates over illegal immigration and citizenship policy.

Hour 3 also examines New York City politics and the rise of democratic socialism, particularly within immigrant communities. The hosts discuss a recent congressional primary involving a socialist candidate who prevailed despite limited support from the local Dominican population, illustrating tensions between progressive activist groups and traditional immigrant voters. This leads to a broader conversation about identity politics, nationalism, and intra-community اختلافs, as well as the misconception that minority groups uniformly support progressive platforms.

In a broader ideological critique, the hosts pivot to a warning about communism, socialism, and collectivist political movements, describing them as a growing threat to American liberty. They draw historical comparisons to regimes under Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot, arguing that modern “democratic socialist” rhetoric obscures the realities of centralized power and individual rights erosion. This segment frames contemporary policy proposals—such as expanded government benefits—as part of a continuum of collectivist ideology, while emphasizing the importance of free markets, individualism, and constitutional governance.

[6/30/2026 3:03 PM] Mark Weiner: Cultural issues also play a significant role in this hour, including debate over transgender athletes in women’s sports and broader discussions around gender identity language and media coverage. The hosts critique what they see as shifting societal norms and media framing, linking these debates to ongoing First Amendment and cultural conflicts in the United States.

Finally, Hour 3 returns to the Supreme Court with discussion of a major campaign finance decision striking down political spending limits, which is framed as a First Amendment victory for political speech. The hosts contrast conservative and progressive approaches to free speech, arguing that the left increasingly supports restrictions when politically advantageous. The hour closes with listener questions on state-level rules for transgender sports participation and constitutional processes such as an Article V convention, reinforcing the show’s focus on constitution